Analytics Approaches to Assessing Clinical Endpoint Data Consistency July 27, 2021 Alan Kott Posted in Data Analytics Share: LinkedInTweet Clinical research sponsors collect more data on more endpoints than ever before, especially since the proliferation of remote/decentralized clinical trials. From electronic data capture systems to digital health technologies and biological data, data sets in clinical research continue to grow exponentially every year. Yet, with so many data points, quality issues and data inconsistencies that result from errors, non-adherence, or fraud often remain hidden until the end of a study. How can study teams leverage these data to monitor endpoint quality throughout the course of a study and program? An in-study data quality monitoring and analytics strategy, such as Signant’s Blinded Data Analytics, can help sponsors proactively monitor data as they flow in, providing opportunities to mitigate consistency, accuracy, and other quality issues before they can compromise a study. Study teams can leverage Signant’s analytics tools and expertise to compare data beyond the individual study; when these data are compared with site-, rater-, country-, and region-level data, analysts and biostatisticians can identify anomalies and outliers that may indicate areas of quality concern. For example, in CNS studies which rely on subjective clinician-reported outcome assessments, data analytics services can identify variations in inter- and intra-rater scoring that can compromise endpoint data reliability. This strategy, coupled with remediation approaches such as rater training programs or independent central reviews of assessments, detects and mitigates common challenges that endanger study success including: Participant eligibility issues Variability in raters’ scoring and administration of assessments Protocol non-adherence Errors Fraud Monitoring data quality in these ways improves endpoint reliability and prevents costly trial failures, but it is equally important to have experienced data scientists, analysts, and clinicians interpret the data to ensure conclusions are correct. Learn more about Signant’s analytics solutions and services, and subscribe to our blog to stay apprised of important trends and topics. Download Blog Alan Kott, MUDr. Clinical Vice President and Practice Lead, Data Analytics Recent Posts eCOA Trial Optimization as the Focus for Decentralized Methods Dec 12, 2022 Signant Health Learn more eCOA A Modular Approach to PROM Implementation – Reflections from ISPOR Europe 2022 Dec 08, 2022 Alexandra Kalpadakis-Smith Learn more eCOA Computerized Adaptive Tests: A Primer Dec 01, 2022 Bill Byrom Learn more Clinical Supplies Track and Cumulate Temperature Excursion Data Easily with Signant’s New Supplies Solution Oct 28, 2022 Signant Health Learn more Clinical Operations Prepare for These 4 Common Scale Management Challenges Sep 28, 2022 Karrie Crocco Learn more
Clinical research sponsors collect more data on more endpoints than ever before, especially since the proliferation of remote/decentralized clinical trials. From electronic data capture systems to digital health technologies and biological data, data sets in clinical research continue to grow exponentially every year. Yet, with so many data points, quality issues and data inconsistencies that result from errors, non-adherence, or fraud often remain hidden until the end of a study. How can study teams leverage these data to monitor endpoint quality throughout the course of a study and program? An in-study data quality monitoring and analytics strategy, such as Signant’s Blinded Data Analytics, can help sponsors proactively monitor data as they flow in, providing opportunities to mitigate consistency, accuracy, and other quality issues before they can compromise a study. Study teams can leverage Signant’s analytics tools and expertise to compare data beyond the individual study; when these data are compared with site-, rater-, country-, and region-level data, analysts and biostatisticians can identify anomalies and outliers that may indicate areas of quality concern. For example, in CNS studies which rely on subjective clinician-reported outcome assessments, data analytics services can identify variations in inter- and intra-rater scoring that can compromise endpoint data reliability. This strategy, coupled with remediation approaches such as rater training programs or independent central reviews of assessments, detects and mitigates common challenges that endanger study success including: Participant eligibility issues Variability in raters’ scoring and administration of assessments Protocol non-adherence Errors Fraud Monitoring data quality in these ways improves endpoint reliability and prevents costly trial failures, but it is equally important to have experienced data scientists, analysts, and clinicians interpret the data to ensure conclusions are correct. Learn more about Signant’s analytics solutions and services, and subscribe to our blog to stay apprised of important trends and topics. Download Blog Alan Kott, MUDr. Clinical Vice President and Practice Lead, Data Analytics